"No room for gifted kids"
As parents
fight for scarce resources, bright young minds are left to languish
by Rachel Mendleson on Monday, February 23,
2009 9:40am - 82 Comments
Whether boards
are doing enough to educate gifted students is open to interpretation. But
since the tide turned toward inclusion, Ontario
has seen some of the most protracted parent-board conflicts surrounding special
education students, including gifted kids. Unique legislation, passed in 1980,
requires boards to have procedures in place for the early identification of
exceptional students, and either provide them with programming or purchase it
from another board. And, significantly, if parents disagree with the outcome of
an assessment or a placement decision, they’re entitled to an appeal.
Cornwall resident Michele Alexis started down
this road when her son Cameron Bharath was in Grade 6. Her charge was that the
Upper Canada District School Board’s criteria for giftedness was too high,
because only a handful of students had been identified. In July 2001, the
special education tribunal ruled in her favour, identifying Cameron, by then in
Grade 8, as gifted, and ordering the board to place him in a full-time high
school program. When September rolled around, however, no such placement had
been created. Alexis took the case to divisional court. But because the wording
of the tribunal order “was too imprecise,” she lost, and was on the hook for
the board’s legal fees. After turning down her proposal to repay the $15,000 in
instalments, the board seized her wages. For five months, Alexis, a doctor who
owns a family practice, did not get paid.
The following
August, the case went to tribunal again. Before the decision was rendered, the
board extended an olive branch, which she accepted: it paid to have a private
car transport Cameron to a full-time gifted class for the duration of his high
school career. (The board later provided the same solution for his two
siblings, the youngest of whom is currently in Grade 12. Alexis estimates the annual
cost to be close to $30,000.) “I still consider myself kind of traumatized by
the whole thing,” she says. “It’s hard to describe how you feel when you’re
made to believe you have certain rights and privileges, and that the process is
there to protect your child—and you discover it does neither.”
The board
declined an interview. But in an email, the superintendent of student support
services said that since the ruling, the board has begun scanning all Grade 4
students for giftedness, has offered enrichment to gifted kids, and developed a
coaching model to help teachers with differentiated instruction.
In the vast
majority of jurisdictions, however, the parent—not the province—remains the
primary watchdog: “We are required to do it, but the problem is the province
and the ministry have not enforced [the legislation],” says Ontario’s Halton Catholic District School
Board trustee Bob Van de Vrande. “That’s a huge and critical gap.” It’s a gap
that has also opened the door to costly demands that cash-strapped boards may
be on the hook to meet. Although some parents are justified, according to
gifted education expert Dona Matthews, “There are people who take it too far in
terms of what their kids need.”
Pressure from
government, teachers and parents means the context for cutting special
education services is rarely the subject of candid discussion. Still, there are
signs that in some jurisdictions, systemic changes are underway. The Ontario government is
training teachers already on the job to satisfy a range of abilities through
differentiated instruction, and recently gave the Ontario Psychological
Association a $20-million grant to ease the backlog in assessments for all
exceptionalities. Recruitment efforts are underway in B.C. to fill school board
psychologist vacancies. And Alberta is
creating a new framework for special education through public
consultation—which, according to Strembitsky, who served as superintendent in Edmonton for 22 years, is
key to staving off conflict. “In the absence of transparency, you get the
different lobby groups, each feeling they have been shortchanged,” he says.
Jeremy
Marshall’s family was fortunate to find a solution. Halfway through his Grade 2
year, they intentionally moved to a neighbourhood that had a school with a
gifted program. Immediately, his mother knew they had made the right decision:
“He would come home and talk about the other kids in his class. He knew their
names, he knew what they looked like. He was interested in them.” Today, Jeremy
is a well-adjusted 13-year-old, who babysits and often MCs school assemblies.
“He’s so different now than that insecure little child who just loved to read,”
she says. “I think finding other gifted children has probably allowed him to
have a normal life.”
by Rachel Mendleson on Monday, February 23, 2009 9:40am - 82 Comments
by Rachel Mendleson on Monday, February 23, 2009 9:40am - 82 Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment